I personally don't care about RGB on things like mice or headsets (you don't see that stuff when gaming anyway) but for things like keyboards or mics it can be a nice extra, and it's definitely nice here. Luckily the mic portion is rather thin so all things considered the Quadcast S itself won't look out of place on smaller desks or in more minimalistic environments. Speaking of: you can't remove the shock guard from the mic itself (or at least you're not supposed to) so bear that in mind if you don't really like the look of the whole package. The only thing that feels a tiny bit flimsy here is the shock guard frame: it flexes a little if you apply pressure to it but then again I assume that only helps with absorbing shocks so I'm not complaining. It's undeniable that this is a well built piece of equipment: the base is really solid and nicely weighted and the mic itself uses quality materials all over. On to my first impressions then, and those were good. One obvious difference is of course the fact that the S has programmable RGB lighting, but both share the same specs page on HyperX's website so I'm assuming they are very much alike when it comes to the overall specs but as I said can't comment on smaller and more subtle differences in the sound quality or what have you. I'll start off by saying that I haven't tested the regular Quadcast, so I can't comment on the similarities and differences between that one and this newer S version.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |